2022年8月12日金曜日

Symphony No. 4 / F Minor / Etude In C♯ Minor, Op. 2, No. 1 by Leopold Stokowski; The American Symphony Orchestra; Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky; Alexander Scriabine; Skryabin Vanguard Cardinal Series (VCS 10095 / VCS•10095) Publication date 1971

 LEC)POLD

STOKOWSK |

TCHAIKOVSKY

SYMPHONY NQ) 4

in F minor, Up. 36

Skryabin / Etude in C’ Minor, Op.2, No

(Orchestrated Stokowski)

AMERICAN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA

Produced by SEYMOUR SOLOMON

Assistant producer Jack Lothrop

ee. ILICH TCHAIKOVSKY (1840-1893) was one of

the shyest of men, but one also who had a great love for people.

As a friend wrote, “he avoided his fellow-men, because he did

not know how to hold his own among them.” It was the people

of eminence, opionated and arrogant in their ideas, whom he had

to deal with, and from whom he quailed. But in his music, his

love for people appears unmistakably, in the warm-heated

melodic appeal, clarity, and inner truth of the works. Notable in

this respect is the Symphony No. 4 in F minor, Op. 36.

dhe symphony was composed in 18/7, less than five years

before the birth in London of the great conductor who leads the

present performance, Leopold Stokowski. Tchaikovsky was then

thirty-seven. There had been lovely music in his previous three

symphonies. But this titanic fourth was nevertheless a break-

through; the first symphony in which he could reach down

profoundly to the inner man, and with this achieve a form and

style that were uniquely his own. His friend Sergey Taneyev was

disturbed by it, and wrote critically, “in every movement there

are phrases which sound like ballet music.” Tchaikovsky an-

swered gently, defending his right to use dance-like strains. And

he added to Taneyev, “there is not a single bar . . . which I have

not truly felt, and which is not an echo of my most intimate

spiritual life.”

‘This inner struggle, a revelation of internal pain combined

with a healing reaching out for the joys of life, has contributed

to the enormous popularity of the Fourth Symphony. It is in

this respect a programmatic work, but no more so, as Tchaikov-

sky pointed out to Taneyev, than the Beethoven Fifth Sym-

phony. Beethoven had said of this symphony’s opening motif,

‘thus fate knocks on the door.” And Tchaikovsky’s symphony is

imbued with the thought of an inexorable fate hanging over

people. But the sound of the two works, of course, is entirely

different. Beethoven’s themes are significant building elements in

a colossal harmonic-melodic development. Tchaikovsky’s themes

are more expanded emotionally and self-contained. Accordingly

their structural role is different, lending themselves to great

contrasts of thematic sections. Furthermore, the view of “fate”

differed from Beethoven, near the beginning of the nineteenth

century, to Tchaikovsky near its close. To Beethoven, it was a

challenge of history and real life, brutal but not necessarily

dismal. To Tchaikovsky, as he explained in a letter to Nadezhda

von Meck about the Fourth Symphony, fate was “that inevitable

force which checks our aspirations toward happiness ere they

reach the goal, which watches jealously lest our peace and bliss

should be complete and cloudless—a force which, like the sword

of Damocles, hangs perpetually over our heads and is always

embittering the soul.”


In the first movement of Symphony No. 4, Tchaikovsky’s

“fate” motif is stated and expanded, Andante sostenuto, to an

entire prologue of twenty-five bars. Then, Moderato con anima, a

subject enters on the violins which is two motifs in one, a

lamenting, sweeping descent and a more yearning rise. The

conflict between these two engenders the entire first section of

the movement. The energy quiets, and there is a magical

contrast, Moderato assai, quasi Andante; a section actually built

of a transformation of the earlier motifs but sounding like a

vision from another world, with its entrancing woodwind solos

and slow pp waltz of the strings. Tchaikovsky describes this in

the letter to Madame von Meck, “A sweet and tender dream

enfolds me. A bright and serene presence leads me on.” Then, as

he says, “Fate awakens us roughly.” The “fate” motif reenters

and brings back the earlier motifs in their original form, to

undergo a powerful developmental conflict. When it runs its

course, the contrasting section reappears, with the bassoon

leading the solos, and this inaugurates a violently conflictful

recapitulation and coda in which the ‘fate’ theme emerges

triumphant.

‘the slow movement is an ornamentation and extension of a

lovely and tender song melody, first played by the oboe;

Andantino in modo di canzone. There is a brighter middle

section, Piii mosso, with abrupt rhythms, like a subdued joy,

which Tchaikovsky writes of as “old memories ... moments

when young blood pulsed through our veins.””

The Scherzo: Pizzicato ostinato (Allegro) is a fantasy move-

ment of remarkable originality. Tchaikovsky describes it to

Madame von Meck as “capricious arabesque ... suddenly

memory calls up the picture of a tipsy peasant and a street song.

From afar come the sounds of a military band.” Illuminating

Tchaikovsky’s entire style, is a comment he makes in another

letter. “You ask me how I manage my instrumentation. I never

compose in the abstract; that is to say the musical thought never

appears otherwise than in a suitable external form. In this way I

invent the musical idea and the instrumentation simultaneously.

Thus I thought out the scherzo of our symphony~at the

moment of its composition—exactly as you heard it. It is

inconceivable except as pizzicato.”” And this movement is but

one example of how, in thinking orchestrally, Tchaikovsky

dethrones the strings from their eminence and while writing

beautifully for them, makes them members of a “community of

equals” with the woodwinds and brass. Noiably in this move-

ment the opening section is for pizzicato strings, the dancing

“tipsy peasant” motif is for woodwinds, the march is for pp

brass, and even when combined the motifs retain their distinct

instrumental sound.

‘The Finale, Allegro con fuoco, is spoken of by Tchaikovsky as

“a rustic holiday .. . indefatigable Fate reminds us once more of

its presence. Others pay no heed to us . . . Happiness does exist,

simple and unspoilt. Be glad in others’ happiness. This makes life

possible.”’ It is a sonata-form rondo, with a fanfare-like opening

motif, and a second theme employing a Russian folk song. It

creates a rousing Russian festival, at the height of which the

“fate” theme gives its ominous warning. There is a stormy,

disturbed but affirmative conclusion.

A love of life permeates this symphony, in conflict with the

thought of “fate” as a sword of Damocles. It makes its effect in

so compelling a way that it is hard to realize today how original

it was, and how disturbed some critics were by it. But they were

also disturbed by the beautiful opera, Eugene Onegin, that he

composed at about the same time. It was so different from the

established norms of grand opera that they claimed it was no

opera. Tchaikovsky wrote to Taneyev with some bitterness,

calling it “my modest work, which I shall not describe as an

opera, if it is published. I should like to call it ‘lyric scenes,’ or

something of that kind.” But he added, “I can at least affirm

that the music proceeds in the most literal sense from my inmost

being.” And this is likewise true of the Fourth Symphony.

Alexander Skryabin (1872-1915) was probably the most

original and experimental of the generation of Russian com-

posers that followed Tchaikovsky. His music has steadily won

greater appreciation. His Etude in C sharp minor, Op. 2 No. 1,

was written for piano. As orchestrated by Leopold Stokowski,

with imagination and devotion, its beautiful and languorous

strains will reach new listeners. sate Finkelee


LEOPOLD STOKOWSKI

Leopold Stokowsk1 Is the son of Boleslaw Kopernik Stokowski

of Lublin, Poland. His music studies took place at the Royal

College of Music in London, at Oxford, and in Paris, Munich and

Berlin. His debut as a conductor took place in 1908 in Paris. The

following year he went to the United States as conductor of the

Cincinnati Symphony. In 1912 he became Music Director of the

Philadelphia Orchestra. He developed this into one of the fore-

most symphonic groups in the world. During the quarter century

of his directorship, this superb instrument set standards for

beauty and splendor of tone, and for profundity of performance.

Stokowski had a unique quality of gaining the cooperation of the

musicians while giving them freedom of individual expression,

thereby developing an orchestra that was flexible and eloquent,

capable of playing every kind of music.

Stokowski was the first to conduct in the United States

various works of Mahler, Stravinsky, Schoenberg, Satie, Proko-

fiev and Shostakovich. He has given hundreds of American scores

their first hearing. He has traveled over almost all of the world,

studying various music cultures. His deep interest in Asiatic

music looks forward to a time of mutually beneficial interaction

between this tradition and that of European music.

in October, 1962, Stokowski created the American Sym-

phony Orchestra to enhance symphonic life in the United States.

Composed partly of the most talented young players who

graduated from the great music schools of the country, and

partly from the experienced free-lance players of New York with

whom he had long been making records, its chief aim was to give

opportunity and musical experience to highly talented people

regardless of age, sex or racial origins, and to make programs

drawing upon the greatest compositions from the 16th century

to the 20th century. The unusual vitality and high caliber of

performance has made the critics compare the American

Symphony Orchestra with the great orchestras of the world,

most of which have had many years to grow.

VANGUARD RECORDING SOCIETY, INC. 71 West 23rd Street, New

York, N.Y. 10010 Printed in U.S.A.


0 件のコメント:

コメントを投稿