2022年8月28日日曜日

Death And Transfiguration / Metamorphosen by Richard Strauss; Otto Klemperer; Philharmonia Orchestra Angel Records (35976 / S 35976) Publication date 1962

 Side One

TOD UND VERKLARUNG, Op. 24

(Death and Transfiguration)

Strauss was 81 when he penned his farewell to

the Good Old Days in Metamorphosen. Tod und

Verklarung, on the other hand, takes us back to

1889, when he was 25. It was his fourth symphonic

poem, and comes in order between Don Juan and

Till Eulenspiegel. The symphonic poems of Strauss

have their source in those of Liszt, and this one is

the most Lisztian of all, because it is more generalized

in content, less concerned with details of thought

and character. Strauss’s great friend and mentor Alex-

ander Ritter wrote a poem about the story of Death

and Transfiguration, and Strauss printed this at the

head of his score. But the music was written before

the poem, and our impressions of Death and Trans-

figuration are accordingly as valid at Ritter’s—so

long as we regard it from a sympathetic Straussian

viewpoint.


The tone poem is about a man who lies dying in

his room. The atmosphere of death hangs heavy

over the sick bed. A gentle woodwind tune suggests

that he is dreaming of far-off happy days. A spell of

agony tacks his body but his spirit is victorious over

death as over the world, because he is a man, and

has an immortal soul. He dreams again of his child-

hood and youth. The music becomes more impas-

sioned, and then we are back in the sickroom again.

He grows weaker, his pulse beats more and more

slowly; at last he sinks back and yields to death. But

out of darkness comes the real victory—release from

the world, transfiguration. The solemn theme of

transfiguring triumph, which is the spirit’s victory

over death, wells up gradually to a superb climax

from which it relaxes into eternal serenity.

Side Two

METAMORPHOSEN

(Study for 23 solo strings)

Strauss once said in his youth that he had begun

creative life as an iconoclast and would end it as an

old master. He was implying that the newfangled

fashions of today always become the dusty clichés

of the day after tomorrow; but he spoke more pro-

phetically than he knew, for the Richard Strauss

who broke impetuously through the sound barrier

in Elektra came back at the end of his life to the

classic style and idiom which he had learned to

handle in his apprentice years.


In 1941, when he put Finis to his last opera,

Capriccio, he firmly intended to retire from compo-

sition: “My next piece will be scored for harps,” he

wrote to his friend Clemens Krauss. But the Paradise

Philharmonic Orchestra was not ready to employ

him. For some years he amused himself, and left

posterity deeply grateful, with instrumental cham-

ber works mostly of concertante nature. These are

exquisitely uncommitted. But in the autumn of 1943

the Munich State Opera House was destroyed in an

air raid; this was the theatre where Strauss had

learned his trade, and it had been for him the symbol

of the old musical life in his native city. His grief

was intense, and at about this time he began to sketch

an Adagio for strings. As it grew, it became a dirge

for the old Munich of the early twentieth century;

a theme of specific mourning was removed and used

in the revised version of Strauss’s Munich Waltz.

Then the theme of the Adagio, beginning with four

repeated notes, acquired a distinctive dotted rhythm

for the drooping notes that followed, and Strauss

realized that it was akin to a phrase from the Funeral

March of Beethoven’s Eroica Symphony. So the

Adagio was diverted to become an essay in thematic

ttansfiguration, or metamorphosis, and the string

orchestra became defined as a body of 23 specified

string soloists (ten violins, five violas, five cellos,

and three double basses). In the spring of 1945 Paul

Sacher commissioned a work from Strauss for his

Zurich orchestra, called the Collegium Musicum;

this was the final incentive, and by April 12 the com-

pleted work was ready; it was performed by the

dedicatees in the following January.


It one analyzes Metamorphosen, it is found to be

based on four distinct thematic fragments some of

which sprout into new themes as the work pro-

gresses. It is probably most useful to summarize such

an analysis as follows: The theme due for meta-

morphosis is the one given out by two violas soon

after the start of the work; it begins with four G’s,

but before this the cellos and basses have suggested

a preludial theme, a quite short, ascending, question-

ing phrase. As the violas’ theme gradually turns into

the Eroica tune (ultimately revealed by cellos and

basses in the closing bars of the work) so the pre-

ludial idea and its fellow-travellers on this road ac-

company and encourage it in its growth. One of

these thematic companions may suggest King Mark

in Wagner's Tristan and Isolde; another seems

connected with Mandryka in Arabella, Strauss’s last

pre-Nazi opera. Metamorphosen is still the single

movement that Strauss first conceived, but Adagio

increases now to Agitato and then sinks back to

Adagio.


Notes ©1962 WILLIAM MANN


Catalog Card Numbers R 62-1413 (mono) and R 62-1414 (stereo) apply to this recording.


0 件のコメント:

コメントを投稿